Att. Gen. v Miller [1999] JLR_Note 14b (25 October 1999)
There is no fixed tariff for breaking and entering offenses; sentencing is at the court's discretion.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Miller
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- clarification
- Legal Topics
- Breaking and Entering, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Miller
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is there a fixed tariff for breaking and entering offenses?
Ratio Decidendi
There is no fixed tariff for breaking and entering offenses; sentencing is at the court's discretion.
Court Disposition
clarification
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment