AG v O'Connor and Ors [2007] JRC 054 (28 February 2007)
Confiscation orders are justified based on civil standard of proof, legal possession/control, and apportionment of benefit among principal organisers; objections by O'Connor and Smitton are rejected as unsupported by evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] JRC 054
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: O'Connor; Respondent: Smitton; Respondent: Courval; Respondent: Heskin; Respondent: Le Geyt
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Confiscation Order Application / Post Conviction Sentencing
- Outcome
- Confiscation orders granted as sought by Attorney General.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Confiscation Orders, Standard of Proof, Benefit Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
O'Connor
Respondent
Smitton
Respondent
Courval
Respondent
Heskin
Respondent
Le Geyt
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Confiscation Order Application / Post Conviction Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether confiscation orders should be made against defendants for proceeds of drug trafficking
- 2 Appropriate standard of proof for benefit determination under Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988
- 3 Apportionment of benefit among organisers and lesser participants
Ratio Decidendi
Confiscation orders are justified based on civil standard of proof, legal possession/control, and apportionment of benefit among principal organisers; objections by O'Connor and Smitton are rejected as unsupported by evidence.
Court Disposition
Confiscation orders granted as sought by Attorney General.
Orders
- Courval: confiscation order £11,156
- Heskin: confiscation order £1
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment