Att. Gen. v O'Neill [1998] JLR_Note 11b (03 April 1998)

Att. Gen. v O'Neill [1998] JLR_Note 11b (03 April 1998)

The court held that the offence involved a device, plan or scheme inconsistent with the application for sentence.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: O'Neill
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
03 April 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Offences Involving Devices, Plans or Schemes, Sentencing
Criminal Law Offences Involving Devices, Plans or Schemes Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

O'Neill

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the offence involved a 'device, plan or scheme' inconsistent with the application for sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the offence involved a device, plan or scheme inconsistent with the application for sentence.

Court Disposition

application dismissed