Att. Gen. v Parrington [2003] JLR_Note 57 (01 December 2003)
The court addressed the entitlement of an accused to request blood, breath, or urine tests during police investigations.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Parrington
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Police Procedure, Blood, Breath and Urine Tests, Request by Accused
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Parrington
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to request blood, breath, or urine tests in the context of police procedure
Ratio Decidendi
The court addressed the entitlement of an accused to request blood, breath, or urine tests during police investigations.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment