Att. Gen. v Stirling [2011] JLR_Note 40 (12 September 2011)
The court determined the appropriate sentence for grave and criminal assault based on the seriousness of the offence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Stirling
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Grave and Criminal Assault, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Stirling
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentence for grave and criminal assault
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sentence for grave and criminal assault based on the seriousness of the offence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment