AG v Taj Mahal Ltd [1994] JRC 006 (14 January 1994)

AG v Taj Mahal Ltd [1994] JRC 006 (14 January 1994)

The court found that Taj Mahal Ltd failed to comply with statutory licensing requirements, constituting a breach.

Citation
[1994] JRC 006
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Taj Mahal Ltd
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
14 January 1994
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
liable
Legal Topics
Licensing, Regulatory Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Taj Mahal Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Taj Mahal Ltd breached licensing regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Taj Mahal Ltd failed to comply with statutory licensing requirements, constituting a breach.

Court Disposition

liable

Orders

  • Penalty imposed for breach of licensing regulations