AG v Tindall and Unicorn Plasterers Ltd [1992] JRC 124 (10 July 1992)
The court found that Unicorn Plasterers Ltd and Tindall were liable based on the evidence and statutory interpretation.
- Citation
- [1992] JRC 124
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Tindall; Respondent: Unicorn Plasterers Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- liability established
- Legal Topics
- Prosecution, Corporate Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Tindall
Respondent
Unicorn Plasterers Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Unicorn Plasterers Ltd and Tindall are criminally liable under Jersey law
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Unicorn Plasterers Ltd and Tindall were liable based on the evidence and statutory interpretation.
Court Disposition
liability established
Orders
- Respondents found liable under criminal law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment