Att. Gen. v Warren [2013] 2 JLR_Note 34 (21 October 2013)
The court determined that the application for a confiscation order was not an abuse of process and proceeded to consider the order.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Warren
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Confiscation Order Application
- Outcome
- application for confiscation order allowed
- Legal Topics
- Drugs, Proceeds of Crime, Confiscation Order, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Warren
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Confiscation Order Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a confiscation order should be made in relation to proceeds of drug trafficking
- 2 Whether there was an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the application for a confiscation order was not an abuse of process and proceeded to consider the order.
Court Disposition
application for confiscation order allowed
Orders
- confiscation order granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment