Att. Gen. v Warren [2009] JLR_Note 31 (20 March 2008)

Att. Gen. v Warren [2009] JLR_Note 31 (20 March 2008)

The court considered whether the authorization for police-intrusive surveillance met the legal requirements under Jersey law.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Warren
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
20 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory
Outcome
not available
Legal Topics
Police Surveillance, Authorization of Intrusive Surveillance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Warren

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Interlocutory

  1. 1 Whether police-intrusive surveillance was properly authorized

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered whether the authorization for police-intrusive surveillance met the legal requirements under Jersey law.

Court Disposition

not available