Att. Gen. v Whiteman [2004] JLR_Note 40 (27 August 2004)
The court determined the appropriate sentence for the offences of possession and uttering of counterfeit currency, emphasizing the need for deterrence and protection of the integrity of the currency.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Whiteman
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Counterfeiting, Possession of Counterfeit Currency, Uttering Counterfeit Currency, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Whiteman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for possession and uttering of counterfeit currency?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sentence for the offences of possession and uttering of counterfeit currency, emphasizing the need for deterrence and protection of the integrity of the currency.
Court Disposition
sentence imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment