Att. Gen. v Young [1998] JLR_Note 16c (09 July 1998)

Att. Gen. v Young [1998] JLR_Note 16c (09 July 1998)

The court determined whether the accused's actions amounted to fraudulent inducement, whether multiple offences were committed, and whether the prosecution was barred by prescription.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Young
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
09 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
unknown
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Inducement, Investor Protection, Prescription, Multiple Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Young

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the accused committed fraudulent inducement of investors
  2. 2 Whether multiple offences were committed
  3. 3 Whether the offences are prescribed

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined whether the accused's actions amounted to fraudulent inducement, whether multiple offences were committed, and whether the prosecution was barred by prescription.

Court Disposition

unknown