1999/107 - AG v Crawford [1999] UR 107 (11 June 1999)
The court has no power to grant bail to a convicted prisoner after the appeal process has concluded, as bail pending appeal is expressly limited to appellants under Article 35(2).
- Citation
- [1999] UR 107
- Parties
- Representor: John Alexander Crawford
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Representation / Application for Bail Post Appeal
- Outcome
- application for bail refused
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Appeals, Remission of Sentence, Prisoner Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
John Alexander Crawford
Representor
Procedural Posture
Representation / Application for Bail Post Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 35(4) of the Court of Appeal (Jersey) Law, 1961 discourages appeals and is contrary to justice
- 2 Whether the Prison Board failed to comply with law and natural justice
- 3 Whether the court has inherent jurisdiction to grant bail to a convicted prisoner post-appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no power to grant bail to a convicted prisoner after the appeal process has concluded, as bail pending appeal is expressly limited to appellants under Article 35(2).
Court Disposition
application for bail refused
Orders
- Application for bail is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment