Ball v King [2006] JLR_Note 28 (11 October 2006)
The court's discretion to extend time must be exercised judiciously based on the circumstances of the case.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ball; Respondent: King
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Extension of Time
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Court Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ball
Applicant
King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant an extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The court's discretion to extend time must be exercised judiciously based on the circumstances of the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment