1998/85 - AG v Gracia and Gracia [1998] UR 85 (24 April 1998)
Despite the seriousness of the offence and the defendants' positions, the court found exceptional circumstances based on their backgrounds and psychiatric reports, justifying probation and community service instead of imprisonment.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 85
- Parties
- Defendant: Belinda Gracia; Defendant: Neil Gracia; Prosecutor: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- non-custodial sentences imposed with fines and probation
- Legal Topics
- Attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice, Forgery, Larceny, Driving Without Due Care and Attention, Breach of Binding Over Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Belinda Gracia
Defendant
Neil Gracia
Defendant
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for attempting to pervert the course of justice by a serving police officer
- 2 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to avoid custodial sentence
- 3 Sentencing for larceny and driving offences
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the seriousness of the offence and the defendants' positions, the court found exceptional circumstances based on their backgrounds and psychiatric reports, justifying probation and community service instead of imprisonment.
Court Disposition
non-custodial sentences imposed with fines and probation
Orders
- Belinda Gracia and Neil Gracia each sentenced to 2 years probation and 140 hours community service to be completed within 12 months for attempting to pervert the course of justice.
- Neil Gracia fined £250 or 1 week Youth Detention in default for driving without due care and attention, licence endorsed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment