Benest v Kendall [1992] JLR_Note 2c (27 July 1992)
The court held that a list of machinery is subject to discovery if relevant to the issues in dispute.
- Parties
- Applicant: Benest; Respondent: Kendall
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- interlocutory order
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, List of Machinery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Benest
Applicant
Kendall
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a list of machinery is discoverable in the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a list of machinery is subject to discovery if relevant to the issues in dispute.
Court Disposition
interlocutory order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment