Benyoucef v. Att. Gen. [2015] 2 JLR 191 (25 November 2015)
The court held that bail hearings are not criminal proceedings, are not limited to evidence admissible in criminal trials, and are not subject to ECHR Article 6. The judge must make an honest and rational decision based on the material before him, with a rebuttable presumption of bail under ECHR Article 5.
- Citation
- [2015] 2 JLR 191
- Parties
- Applicant: Benyoucef; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Application / Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail application considered under the correct legal principles; specific outcome not provided in summary.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Evidentiary Standards in Bail Hearings, Application of ECHR Article 5
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benyoucef
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Application / Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consideration of bail constitutes criminal proceedings
- 2 Whether the court is restricted to material admissible in criminal proceedings when considering bail
- 3 Applicability of Criminal Justice (Evidence and Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1998 and ECHR Article 6 to bail hearings
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that bail hearings are not criminal proceedings, are not limited to evidence admissible in criminal trials, and are not subject to ECHR Article 6. The judge must make an honest and rational decision based on the material before him, with a rebuttable presumption of bail under ECHR Article 5.
Court Disposition
Bail application considered under the correct legal principles; specific outcome not provided in summary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment