1998/121 - AG v Bio - Nique and Bio - Trans [1998] UR 121 (12 June 1998)

1998/121 - AG v Bio - Nique and Bio - Trans [1998] UR 121 (12 June 1998)

Both companies breached Article 4(1) by failing to register as data processors; cooperation and first offence were mitigating factors but did not negate liability.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UR 121
Parties
Defendant: Bio-Nique Limited; Defendant: Bio-Trans (Jersey) Limited; Prosecutor: Data Protection Registrar
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
12 June 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
conviction and fine
Legal Topics
Failure to Register Data Processing, First Offence Under Data Protection Law
Data Protection Criminal Law Failure to Register Data Processing First Offence Under Data Protection Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bio-Nique Limited

Defendant

Bio-Trans (Jersey) Limited

Defendant

Data Protection Registrar

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the companies breached Article 4(1) of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law, 1987 by failing to register as data processors

Ratio Decidendi

Both companies breached Article 4(1) by failing to register as data processors; cooperation and first offence were mitigating factors but did not negate liability.

Court Disposition

conviction and fine

Orders

  • A fine of £500 and costs of £125 imposed on each company