1998/121 - AG v Bio - Nique and Bio - Trans [1998] UR 121 (12 June 1998)
Both companies breached Article 4(1) by failing to register as data processors; cooperation and first offence were mitigating factors but did not negate liability.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 121
- Parties
- Defendant: Bio-Nique Limited; Defendant: Bio-Trans (Jersey) Limited; Prosecutor: Data Protection Registrar
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and fine
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Register Data Processing, First Offence Under Data Protection Law
Data Protection Criminal Law Failure to Register Data Processing First Offence Under Data Protection Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Bio-Nique Limited
Defendant
Bio-Trans (Jersey) Limited
Defendant
Data Protection Registrar
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the companies breached Article 4(1) of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law, 1987 by failing to register as data processors
Ratio Decidendi
Both companies breached Article 4(1) by failing to register as data processors; cooperation and first offence were mitigating factors but did not negate liability.
Court Disposition
conviction and fine
Orders
- A fine of £500 and costs of £125 imposed on each company
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment