Bowen v Noel Invs. [1990] JLR 184 (05 September 1990)

Bowen v Noel Invs. [1990] JLR 184 (05 September 1990)

An action is not obviously and incontestably bad if it is unclear whether it was commenced by an improper procedure, such as an action for payment of a stopped cheque commenced by ordre provisoire.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1990] JLR 184
Parties
Plaintiff: Bowen; Defendant: Noel Investments
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
05 September 1990
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
Outcome
Application to strike out refused
Legal Topics
Pleading, Striking Out, Abuse of Process
Civil Procedure Pleading Striking Out Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bowen

Plaintiff

Noel Investments

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Strike Out Pleadings

  1. 1 Whether an action should be struck out as an abuse of process under Royal Court Rules, 1982, r.6/13(d)
  2. 2 Whether the action is obviously and incontestably bad

Ratio Decidendi

An action is not obviously and incontestably bad if it is unclear whether it was commenced by an improper procedure, such as an action for payment of a stopped cheque commenced by ordre provisoire.

Court Disposition

Application to strike out refused