AG v Marsh [2002] JRC 22 (25 January 2002)

AG v Marsh [2002] JRC 22 (25 January 2002)

Despite substantial mitigation, abuse of trust and fraudulent conversion by employee warrants custodial sentence to deter similar conduct in the community.

Citation
[2002] JRC 22
Parties
Accused: Marsh; Prosecutor: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
25 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Breach of Trust, Fraud, Sentencing
Criminal Law Breach of Trust Fraud Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marsh

Accused

Crown

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentence for breach of trust and fraud by employee

Ratio Decidendi

Despite substantial mitigation, abuse of trust and fraudulent conversion by employee warrants custodial sentence to deter similar conduct in the community.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 18 months' imprisonment on each count, total 18 months' imprisonment