Singleton v G Thatcher Felt Roofing [2002] JRC 102A (22 May 2002)
The defendant's conduct constituted special or unusual circumstances justifying indemnity costs, as liability was admitted but the defendant's legal advisers prevaricated and refused to address the issue directly, forcing the plaintiff to issue the summons.
- Citation
- [2002] JRC 102A
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Brian Singleton; Defendant: G. Thatcher Felt Roofing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Costs Determination Following Resolution of Liability
- Outcome
- Indemnity costs awarded to plaintiff for the summons of 20th February 2002.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Admission of Liability, Interim Payments, Vicarious Liability, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Singleton
Plaintiff
G. Thatcher Felt Roofing Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Costs Determination Following Resolution of Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded to the plaintiff for the summons issued on 20th February 2002
- 2 Whether liability was unequivocally admitted by the defendant prior to proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's conduct constituted special or unusual circumstances justifying indemnity costs, as liability was admitted but the defendant's legal advisers prevaricated and refused to address the issue directly, forcing the plaintiff to issue the summons.
Court Disposition
Indemnity costs awarded to plaintiff for the summons of 20th February 2002.
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs relating to the summons on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment