AG v Brown [2005] JRC 162 (16 November 2005)

AG v Brown [2005] JRC 162 (16 November 2005)

A starting point of 3½ years was considered appropriate, but mitigating factors including a guilty plea, limited prior imprisonment, and personal support justified a sentence of 2 years' imprisonment concurrent on the main count.

Citation
[2005] JRC 162
Parties
Defendant: Brown; Prosecution: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Assault, Sentencing, Mitigation, Use of Weapons
Criminal Law Assault Sentencing Mitigation Use of Weapons

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brown

Defendant

Crown

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for assault with a knife
  2. 2 Consideration of mitigating factors in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

A starting point of 3½ years was considered appropriate, but mitigating factors including a guilty plea, limited prior imprisonment, and personal support justified a sentence of 2 years' imprisonment concurrent on the main count.

Court Disposition

Convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 2 weeks' imprisonment on Count 1
  • 2 years' imprisonment on Count 2, concurrent, total 2 years' imprisonment