Bruton v Att. Gen. [2000] JLR_Note 58c (14 July 2000)
The court held that a debt to a drug dealer cannot be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing for drug offences.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bruton; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Mitigation argument rejected
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Mitigation, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Bruton
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether debt to drug dealer is a valid mitigating factor in sentencing for drug offences
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a debt to a drug dealer cannot be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing for drug offences.
Court Disposition
Mitigation argument rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment