AG v Buckley [2001] JRC 175 (06 August 2001)
Custodial sentences are generally required for dishonesty offences involving breach of trust, but mitigating factors such as guilty pleas, cooperation, lesser responsibility, and positive background may justify reduced or alternative penalties.
- Citation
- [2001] JRC 175
- Parties
- Defendant: Buckley; Defendant: Kirkland; Defendant: Hébert; Defendant: White; Victim: BG Romeril & Co Ltd; Prosecutor: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Dishonesty, Breach of Trust, Sentencing, Compensation, Community Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Buckley
Defendant
Kirkland
Defendant
Hébert
Defendant
White
Defendant
BG Romeril & Co Ltd
Victim
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for offences of dishonesty involving breach of trust
- 2 Mitigating factors in sentencing
- 3 Compensation orders for victims
Ratio Decidendi
Custodial sentences are generally required for dishonesty offences involving breach of trust, but mitigating factors such as guilty pleas, cooperation, lesser responsibility, and positive background may justify reduced or alternative penalties.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Buckley: 18 months' imprisonment on count 1, 18 months' imprisonment on count 2 (concurrent), compensation of £12,500 at £300/month (first year) and £320/month (second year) commencing two months after release, 12 months' imprisonment consecutive in default.
- Kirkland: 9 months' imprisonment on count 3, compensation of £1,500 at £300/month commencing two months after release, 3 months' imprisonment consecutive in default.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment