Jersey Judgment

Burnett v Att. Gen. [2008] JLR 117 (04 April 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Exceeding the speed limit under the Road Traffic (Speed Limits) (Jersey) Order 2003 is a strict liability offence because the statutory context and purpose displace the presumption of mens rea.

Court disposition

offence found to be strict liability

02

Material facts

Parties

Burnett

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant likely argued that the offence should require proof of mens rea and that strict liability should not apply.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the offence is one of strict liability and that the presumption of mens rea is displaced by the statutory context.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Interpretation of the Road Traffic (Speed Limits) (Jersey) Order 2003 and general principles of criminal law regarding strict liability

    Certain statutory offences, particularly regulatory offences such as road traffic violations, may be construed as strict liability offences where the legislative intent is clear and the presumption of mens rea is displaced.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Exceeding the speed limit under the Road Traffic (Speed Limits) (Jersey) Order 2003 is a strict liability offence because the statutory context and purpose displace the presumption of mens rea.

Obiter and limits

  • Reasons why the presumption of mens rea is displaced in regulatory offences such as road traffic violations.

Court disposition

offence found to be strict liability

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2008] JLR 117

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Burnett v Att. Gen. [2008] JLR 117 (04 April 2008) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR080117.html Cite as: [2008] JLR 117 [ New search ] [ Help ] Burnett v Att. Gen. 2008 JLR 117 (04 April 2008) Road Traffic-speeding-elements of offence-exceeding speed limit in Road Traffic (Speed Limits) (Jersey) Order 2003 is strict liability offence-reasons why presumption of mens rea displaced The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2008 JLR 117 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR080117.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Road Traffic (Speed Limits) (Jersey) Order 2003

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.