In re C.J.R. v [2006] JLR_Note 22 (22 August 2006)
The court considered the requirements for consent to medical treatment and the circumstances under which an interdict may be appropriate.
- Parties
- Applicant: C. J. R.; Respondent: Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Treatment Consent/interdict / Judgment Note
- Legal Topics
- Consent to Medical Treatment, Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
C. J. R.
Applicant
Unknown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Medical Treatment Consent/interdict / Judgment Note
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consent to medical treatment can be lawfully withheld or interdict granted
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the requirements for consent to medical treatment and the circumstances under which an interdict may be appropriate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment