C v AG [2020] JRC 083 (13 May 2020)
The applicant has demonstrated through risk assessments, compliance, and absence of reoffending that continued notification requirements are not justified under Article 5(6) of the 2010 Law.
- Citation
- [2020] JRC 083
- Parties
- Applicant: C; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Sex Offenders (jersey) Law 2010 Article 5(5) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Sex Offenders Notification Requirements, De Notification, Risk Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
C
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Sex Offenders (jersey) Law 2010 Article 5(5) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should no longer be subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant has demonstrated through risk assessments, compliance, and absence of reoffending that continued notification requirements are not justified under Article 5(6) of the 2010 Law.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant is no longer subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment