C -v- AG [2015] JCA 159 (29 July 2015)
The imposition of a discretionary life sentence was justified because the appellant was convicted of very serious sexual offences and there was ample evidence that he posed a significant and indeterminate risk to adolescent and pre-pubescent females. The Royal Court did not err in principle and properly applied the relevant legal tests.
- Citation
- [2015] JCA 159
- Parties
- Appellant: C; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal allowed; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Life Imprisonment, Sexual Offences, Public Protection, Risk Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C
Appellant
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imposition of a discretionary life sentence for rape was justified under Jersey law given the seriousness of the offence and the risk to the public.
- 2 Whether the Royal Court erred in law by basing its reasoning for a life sentence solely on the seriousness of the offence without sufficient consideration of future risk.
Ratio Decidendi
The imposition of a discretionary life sentence was justified because the appellant was convicted of very serious sexual offences and there was ample evidence that he posed a significant and indeterminate risk to adolescent and pre-pubescent females. The Royal Court did not err in principle and properly applied the relevant legal tests.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal allowed; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Life sentence with a minimum term of 10 years upheld.
- Concurrent sentences on other counts remain.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment