C -v- AG [2015] JCA 159 (29 July 2015)

C -v- AG [2015] JCA 159 (29 July 2015)

The imposition of a discretionary life sentence was justified because the appellant was convicted of very serious sexual offences and there was ample evidence that he posed a significant and indeterminate risk to adolescent and pre-pubescent females. The Royal Court did not err in principle and properly applied the relevant legal tests.

Citation
[2015] JCA 159
Parties
Appellant: C; Respondent: The Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
29 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application for leave to appeal allowed; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Life Imprisonment, Sexual Offences, Public Protection, Risk Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C

Appellant

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the imposition of a discretionary life sentence for rape was justified under Jersey law given the seriousness of the offence and the risk to the public.
  2. 2 Whether the Royal Court erred in law by basing its reasoning for a life sentence solely on the seriousness of the offence without sufficient consideration of future risk.

Ratio Decidendi

The imposition of a discretionary life sentence was justified because the appellant was convicted of very serious sexual offences and there was ample evidence that he posed a significant and indeterminate risk to adolescent and pre-pubescent females. The Royal Court did not err in principle and properly applied the relevant legal tests.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal allowed; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Life sentence with a minimum term of 10 years upheld.
  • Concurrent sentences on other counts remain.