Caboz v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR 80 (02 March 2004)

Caboz v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR 80 (02 March 2004)

The court is not bound to accept the entire prosecution version of facts after a guilty verdict if the facts are disputed at sentencing; it must consider all evidence adduced.

Citation
[2004] JLR 80
Parties
Applicant: Caboz; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
02 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
guidance on sentencing procedure
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Summary of Facts, Disputed Facts
Criminal Law Sentencing Summary of Facts Disputed Facts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Caboz

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court is bound to accept the entire prosecution version of facts after a guilty verdict when facts are disputed at sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The court is not bound to accept the entire prosecution version of facts after a guilty verdict if the facts are disputed at sentencing; it must consider all evidence adduced.

Court Disposition

guidance on sentencing procedure