Jersey Judgment

Cafe de Lecq v Rossborough [2012] 2 JLR 155 (23 August 2012)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A party who unreasonably refuses to engage in mediation may be ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis, but a reasonable belief in the merits of the case can justify refusal.

Court disposition

Costs may be ordered on an indemnity basis for unreasonable refusal to mediate, subject to the court's assessment of reasonableness.

02

Material facts

Parties

Cafe de Lecq

Applicant

Rossborough

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Costs Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether costs may be ordered on an indemnity basis against a party who unreasonably refuses to engage in mediation

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought indemnity costs on the basis that the respondent unreasonably refused to engage in mediation.
Respondent
Respondent argued that their refusal to mediate was reasonable due to a belief in the merits of their case.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey Law Reports [2012] 2 JLR 155

    Costs may be ordered on an indemnity basis against a party who unreasonably refuses to engage in mediation. The party seeking such an award must satisfy the court that the refusal was unreasonable. Relevant factors include the likelihood of success, character of the litigants, cost, and delay. A reasonable belief in the merits of the case may justify refusal.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A party who unreasonably refuses to engage in mediation may be ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis, but a reasonable belief in the merits of the case can justify refusal.

Court disposition

Costs may be ordered on an indemnity basis for unreasonable refusal to mediate, subject to the court's assessment of reasonableness.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2012] 2 JLR 155

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Cafe de Lecq v Rossborough [2012] 2 JLR 155 (23 August 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122155.html Cite as: [2012] 2 JLR 155 [ New search ] [ Help ] Cafe de Lecq v Rossborough 2012 (2) JLR 155 (23 August 2012) Civil Procedure-mediation-refusal of mediation-costs may be ordered on indemnity basis against party who unreasonably refuses to engage in mediation-party seeking award to satisfy court that refusal unreasonable-relevant factors include likelihood of success; character of litigants; cost; and delay-reasonable belief in merits of case may justify refusal The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2012 (2) JLR 155 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122155.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

[2012] 2 JLR 155

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.