The Attorney General v Callum Rose [2021] JRC 274 (04 November 2021)

The Attorney General v Callum Rose [2021] JRC 274 (04 November 2021)

The defendant's acute psychotic state was the primary motivating factor in the offence, resulting in low culpability; a Treatment Order under Article 65 and Restriction Order under Article 68 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016 are appropriate to address treatment needs and public protection.

Citation
[2021] JRC 274
Parties
Defendant: Callum; Victim: His father
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
04 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Treatment Order and Restriction Order imposed
Legal Topics
Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders, Treatment and Restriction Orders, Culpability Assessment
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders Treatment and Restriction Orders Culpability Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Callum

Defendant

His father

Victim

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentencing for an offender with paranoid schizophrenia
  2. 2 Causal connection between mental disorder and offence
  3. 3 Protection of the public versus punishment

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's acute psychotic state was the primary motivating factor in the offence, resulting in low culpability; a Treatment Order under Article 65 and Restriction Order under Article 68 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016 are appropriate to address treatment needs and public protection.

Court Disposition

Treatment Order and Restriction Order imposed

Orders

  • Treatment Order under Article 65 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016
  • Restriction Order under Article 68 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016