Jersey Judgment

Campbell v. Campbell [2014] 2 JLR 465 (07 November 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The allocation of the burden of proof depends on the nature of the application: the defendant bears the burden on a forum non conveniens stay application, while the plaintiff bears the burden on an application to set aside leave for service out of jurisdiction.

02

Material facts

Parties

Campbell

Plaintiff

Campbell

Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Application to Stay Proceedings / Application to Set Aside Order Granting Leave for Service Out of Jurisdiction

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Which party bears the burden of proof in applications regarding forum non conveniens and service out of jurisdiction?

Party arguments

Applicant
The defendant argues that another forum is more appropriate and seeks a stay of proceedings or to set aside the order for service out of jurisdiction.
Respondent
The plaintiff argues that Jersey is the appropriate forum for the proceedings.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Campbell v. Campbell [2014] 2 JLR 465

    On an application to stay proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens, the burden is on the defendant to show that another forum is more appropriate.

  2. 02

    Campbell v. Campbell [2014] 2 JLR 465

    On an application to set aside an order granting leave for service of proceedings out of the jurisdiction, the burden is on the plaintiff to show that Jersey is the appropriate forum.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The allocation of the burden of proof depends on the nature of the application: the defendant bears the burden on a forum non conveniens stay application, while the plaintiff bears the burden on an application to set aside leave for service out of jurisdiction.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2014] 2 JLR 465

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Campbell v. Campbell [2014] 2 JLR 465 (07 November 2014) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR142465.html Cite as: [2014] 2 JLR 465 [ New search ] [ Help ] Campbell v. Campbell 2014 (2) JLR 465 (07 November 2014) Conflict of Laws-jurisdiction-forum conveniens-burden of proof-on application to stay proceedings on ground of forum non conveniens, burden on defendant to show other forum more appropriate-on application to set aside order granting leave for service of proceedings out of jurisdiction, burden on plaintiff to show Jersey appropriate forum The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2014 (2) JLR 465 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR142465.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Campbell v. Campbell [2014] 2 JLR 465

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.