Charles Le Quesne (1956) Ltd. v TSB Channel Islands Ltd. [1987] JLR_Note 1a (10 July 1987)

The court held that facts found by an arbitrator are not subject to appeal and the arbitrator is not to be cross-examined.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Applicant: Charles Le Quesne (1956) Ltd.; Respondent: TSB Channel Islands Ltd.
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 10 July 1987
Procedural Posture: Civil / Judgment
Outcome: application dismissed
Legal Topics: Appealability of Facts, Arbitrator's Evidence

Arbitration Appealability of Facts Arbitrator's Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Charles Le Quesne (1956) Ltd.

Applicant

TSB Channel Islands Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether facts found by an arbitrator are appealable
2 Whether an arbitrator may be cross-examined

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that facts found by an arbitrator are not subject to appeal and the arbitrator is not to be cross-examined.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.