1999/102 - AG v Chevalier [1999] UR 102 (9 June 1999)
The defendant was found in possession of commercial quantities of heroin with high purity, packaged for supply, and admitted acting as a delivery man for suppliers. The Court applied sentencing guidelines for commercial trafficking, setting a starting point of 7 years, and imposed concurrent sentences reflecting the seriousness of the offence and the defendant's role.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 102
- Parties
- Defendant: Chevalier; Prosecutor: Attorney General; Probation Officer: Dr Kelleher
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Possession With Intent to Supply, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chevalier
Defendant
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Dr Kelleher
Probation Officer
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant possessed heroin with intent to supply
- 2 Appropriate sentencing for possession of heroin with intent to supply
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was found in possession of commercial quantities of heroin with high purity, packaged for supply, and admitted acting as a delivery man for suppliers. The Court applied sentencing guidelines for commercial trafficking, setting a starting point of 7 years, and imposed concurrent sentences reflecting the seriousness of the offence and the defendant's role.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Chevalier sentenced to 5½ years' imprisonment on count 7 and lesser concurrent sentences on other counts, all sentences to run concurrently
- Order for forfeiture and destruction of drugs seized
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment