Bryce-Richards -v- AG 24-Jan-2006 [2006] JCA 010 (24 January 2006)
The Court found no error in the trial judge's refusal to adjourn, the admission of hearsay evidence was proper and fair, the summing up was impartial and adequately presented the defence case, and the verdict was reasonable on the evidence. Leave to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [2006] JCA 010
- Parties
- Appellant: Christine Bryce-Richards; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction, Sentence, and Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Conversion, Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence, Judicial Impartiality, Summing Up by Judge, Conflicts of Interest in Trusts, Confiscation Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christine Bryce-Richards
Appellant
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction, Sentence, and Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing an adjournment
- 2 Whether the admission of hearsay evidence from a deceased witness was proper
- 3 Whether the judge's summing up was impartial and fair
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found no error in the trial judge's refusal to adjourn, the admission of hearsay evidence was proper and fair, the summing up was impartial and adequately presented the defence case, and the verdict was reasonable on the evidence. Leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment