AG -v- Morgan 25-Apr-2006 [2006] JRC 063 (25 April 2006)
The court found that the defendant's benefit from drug trafficking included the value of the cannabis stash (£65,500), cash found in the garage (£32,750), and money taken to the UK (£5,000), totaling £103,250, and ordered confiscation of that amount as the defendant's realisable assets exceeded the benefit figure.
- Citation
- [2006] JRC 063
- Parties
- Defendant: Christopher Thomas Morgan; Prosecutor: Attorney General; Interested Party: Mrs Morgan
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Confiscation Proceedings / Judgment Following Guilty Plea and Sentencing
- Outcome
- confiscation order granted
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Confiscation of Proceeds, Benefit Assessment, Realisable Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Thomas Morgan
Defendant
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Mrs Morgan
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Criminal Confiscation Proceedings / Judgment Following Guilty Plea and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant benefited from drug trafficking beyond admitted sums
- 2 Whether the value of the cannabis stash and other sums should be included in the benefit calculation
- 3 Assessment of realisable assets for confiscation
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant's benefit from drug trafficking included the value of the cannabis stash (£65,500), cash found in the garage (£32,750), and money taken to the UK (£5,000), totaling £103,250, and ordered confiscation of that amount as the defendant's realisable assets exceeded the benefit figure.
Court Disposition
confiscation order granted
Orders
- Confiscation order in the sum of £103,250 against the defendant
- Stay of three months on disposal of matrimonial home asset if required
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment