harris v AG [2001] JCA 150 (19 July 2001)

harris v AG [2001] JCA 150 (19 July 2001)

The appropriate starting point for manslaughter arising from the supply or administration of Class A drugs is 8 years. The mitigation available to the appellant could not justify a reduction below the sentence imposed. The totality principle was not offended as the sentences for possession were distinct, committed while on bail, and the overall sentence was not excessive.

Citation
[2001] JCA 150
Parties
Appellant: Christopher Timothy Harris; Respondent: The Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
19 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Drug Offences, Sentencing, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Manslaughter Drug Offences Sentencing Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Timothy Harris

Appellant

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate starting point for sentencing in manslaughter cases arising from the supply or administration of illegal Class A drugs?
  2. 2 Did the Royal Court err in its application of the totality principle when imposing consecutive sentences for drug possession in addition to manslaughter?
  3. 3 Was sufficient mitigation given for the appellant's guilty plea, cooperation, and remorse?

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate starting point for manslaughter arising from the supply or administration of Class A drugs is 8 years. The mitigation available to the appellant could not justify a reduction below the sentence imposed. The totality principle was not offended as the sentences for possession were distinct, committed while on bail, and the overall sentence was not excessive.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • No part of the time spent by the defendant in custody pending appeal shall be disregarded in computing the time period in prison.