Cridland (Classic Trading Co.) v Declercq [1992] JCA 011 (22 January 1992)

Cridland (Classic Trading Co.) v Declercq [1992] JCA 011 (22 January 1992)

The court found that the respondent breached the contract and the applicant is entitled to damages.

Citation
[1992] JCA 011
Parties
Applicant: Classic Trading Co.; Respondent: Declercq
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 January 1992
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appellate
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Damages
Contract Law Breach of Contract Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Classic Trading Co.

Applicant

Declercq

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appellate

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent breached the contract with the applicant
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to damages

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent breached the contract and the applicant is entitled to damages.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay damages to applicant