Congdon v Att. Gen. [2002] JLR_Note 12 (12 February 2002)
The sentence for fraudulent conversion must reflect the gravity of the offence while taking into account any mitigating circumstances presented by the applicant.
- Parties
- Applicant: Congdon; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Conversion, Sentence, Mitigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Congdon
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for fraudulent conversion?
- 2 What mitigating factors should be considered in sentencing for fraudulent conversion?
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence for fraudulent conversion must reflect the gravity of the offence while taking into account any mitigating circumstances presented by the applicant.
Court Disposition
sentence imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment