Arcturus and others v AG [2000] JRC 174 (07 September 2000)
The court refused the application for disclosure, holding that Conrho Limited should seek the documents from the banks as their customer, and that it was not appropriate to order the Attorney General to provide copies at this stage of the criminal investigation.
- Citation
- [2000] JRC 174
- Parties
- Applicant: Conrho Limited; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Judicial Review Procedure, Investigation of Fraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conrho Limited
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Attorney General should be ordered to provide copies of documents obtained from banks under the Investigation of Fraud (Jersey) Law 1991 during an ongoing criminal investigation
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to disclosure of such documents at this stage
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused the application for disclosure, holding that Conrho Limited should seek the documents from the banks as their customer, and that it was not appropriate to order the Attorney General to provide copies at this stage of the criminal investigation.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Order made in terms of the draft consent order with variations: period for filing amended representation and answer reduced to 10 days each; consequential changes to undertakings; hearing date fixed for 25th-27th October with liberty to apply to change by end of next week; application for disclosure of documents...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment