Jersey Judgment

Cooley v Wood [1993] JLR 24 (19 February 1993)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Where there is no evidence of agreement, capital profits in a quasi-partnership company are to be divided in proportion to shareholding or as if dissolving an equal partnership, not in proportion to investment.

Court disposition

assets to be distributed in accordance with the court's determination

Orders

  • assets, including sums contributed to make up capital losses, to be applied in (a) payment of liabilities to third parties; (b) payment of loans to company; (c) repayment of partners' capital investment; and (d) division of residue between partners as if dissolving equal partnership or in proportion to shareholding

02

Material facts

Parties

Cooley

Applicant

Wood

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Company Law Dispute / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

How should assets, including sums contributed to make up capital losses, be distributed in a quasi-partnership company upon dissolution when there is no evidence of agreement?

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant contended for distribution of capital profits in proportion to investment.
Respondent
Respondent argued for division as if dissolving an equal partnership or in proportion to shareholding.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    [1993] JLR 24

    In the absence of agreement, capital profits in a quasi-partnership company are to be divided in proportion to shareholding or as if dissolving an equal partnership, not in proportion to investment.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Where there is no evidence of agreement, capital profits in a quasi-partnership company are to be divided in proportion to shareholding or as if dissolving an equal partnership, not in proportion to investment.

Court disposition

assets to be distributed in accordance with the court's determination

  • assets, including sums contributed to make up capital losses, to be applied in (a) payment of liabilities to third parties; (b) payment of loans to company; (c) repayment of partners' capital investment; and (d) division of residue between partners as if dissolving equal partnership or in proportion to shareholding

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1993] JLR 24

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Cooley v Wood [1993] JLR 24 (19 February 1993) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1993/JLR930024.html Cite as: [1993] JLR 24 [ New search ] [ Help ] Cooley v Wood 1993 JLR 24 (19 February 1993) Companies - quasi-partnership company - distribution of property - assets, including sums contributed to make up capital losses, to be applied in (a) payment of liabilities to third parties; (b) payment of loans to company; (c) repayment of partners' capital investment; and (d) division of residue between partners-if no evidence of agreement, capital profits to be divided in proportion to shareholding or as if dissolving equal partnership, not in proportion to investment The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1993 JLR 24 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1993/JLR930024.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.