Corby v Ffrench [1996] JLR_Note 19c (22 May 1996)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that a claim to interest may arise where there is a delay in payment of legitime.
Court disposition
undisclosed
02
Material facts
Parties
Corby
ApplicantFfrench
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether interest is payable on legitime due to delay in payment
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey succession law
Interest may be claimed on legitime if there is a delay in payment.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that a claim to interest may arise where there is a delay in payment of legitime.
Court disposition
undisclosed
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Corby v Ffrench [1996] JLR_Note 19c (22 May 1996) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1996/JLR96N019c.html Cite as: [1996] JLR_Note 19c [ New search ] [ Help ] Corby v Ffrench 1996 JLR Note 19c (22 May 1996)
LEGITIME -delay in payment-claim to interest The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1996 JLR Note 19c BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1996/JLR96N019c.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.