Crill Canavan -v- MacKinnon [2012] JRC 140A (23 July 2012)

Crill Canavan -v- MacKinnon [2012] JRC 140A (23 July 2012)

Both parties failed to prosecute their claims with reasonable diligence, but the defendant's failure to issue a summons for directions was excusable due to the plaintiff's responsibility under the stay order. The balance of justice favours reinstating both claim and counterclaim to allow resolution of substantial claims and ensure proportionate access to justice.

Citation
[2012] JRC 140A
Parties
Plaintiff: Crill Canavan; Defendant: Defendant (unnamed)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against Master's Decision to Strike Out Claim and Counterclaim
Outcome
Appeal allowed; both Order of Justice and Answer and Counterclaim reinstated.
Legal Topics
Striking Out Proceedings, Delay in Prosecution, Summons for Directions, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Access to Justice
Civil Procedure Contract Law Professional Negligence Striking Out Proceedings Delay in Prosecution Summons for Directions Breach of Contract Negligence +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crill Canavan

Plaintiff

Defendant (unnamed)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Against Master's Decision to Strike Out Claim and Counterclaim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Master's practice under Rule 6/26(13) is consistent with the Rules
  2. 2 Whether both parties prosecuted their claims with reasonable diligence
  3. 3 Whether failure to issue a summons for directions was excusable

Ratio Decidendi

Both parties failed to prosecute their claims with reasonable diligence, but the defendant's failure to issue a summons for directions was excusable due to the plaintiff's responsibility under the stay order. The balance of justice favours reinstating both claim and counterclaim to allow resolution of substantial claims and ensure proportionate access to justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; both Order of Justice and Answer and Counterclaim reinstated.

Orders

  • Order of Justice reinstated
  • Answer and Counterclaim reinstated