Cronin v Gordon-Bennet [2003] JLR_Note 22 (23 June 2003)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The entitlement of an estate agent to commission depends on the fulfillment of the agency agreement's terms.
02
Material facts
Parties
Cronin
ApplicantGordon-Bennet
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the estate agent is entitled to commission
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
general agency law
An estate agent is entitled to commission if the terms of the agency agreement are fulfilled.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The entitlement of an estate agent to commission depends on the fulfillment of the agency agreement's terms.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Cronin v Gordon-Bennet [2003] JLR_Note 22 (23 June 2003) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2003/JLR03N022.html Cite as: [2003] JLR_Note 22 [ New search ] [ Help ] Cronin v Gordon-Bennet 2003 JLR Note 22 (23 June 2003) Agency-estate agents-commission The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2003 JLR Note 22 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2003/JLR03N022.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.