AG v Ahmed [2011] JRC 078 (13 April 2011)

Ahmed's continued presence in Jersey is not conducive to the public good due to his serious criminal offence, and there are no human rights factors that outweigh the desirability of deportation.

Citation: [2011] JRC 078
Parties: Applicant: Crown; Defendant: Ahmed
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 13 April 2011
Procedural Posture: Application for Deportation Order / Post Conviction, Sentencing
Outcome: recommendation for deportation order granted
Legal Topics: Deportation, Drug Trafficking, Public Good, Human Rights

Criminal Law Immigration Law Deportation Drug Trafficking Public Good Human Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Crown

Applicant

Ahmed

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Deportation Order / Post Conviction, Sentencing

Legal Issues

1 Whether Ahmed's continued presence in Jersey is conducive to the public good
2 Whether there are human rights considerations that outweigh deportation

Ratio Decidendi

Ahmed's continued presence in Jersey is not conducive to the public good due to his serious criminal offence, and there are no human rights factors that outweigh the desirability of deportation.

Court Disposition

recommendation for deportation order granted

Orders

Recommendation made to the Lieutenant Governor that Ahmed be deported from Jersey at the conclusion of his sentence.