AG v AKK [2004] JRC 152 (03 September 2004)

AG v AKK [2004] JRC 152 (03 September 2004)

The defendant's persistent failure to respond to non-custodial penalties, irresponsible conduct, and disregard for court orders satisfy the statutory criteria for youth detention under Article 4(2), making a custodial sentence unavoidable and necessary.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] JRC 152
Parties
Applicant: Crown; Respondent: Defendant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
03 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Youth Detention, Sentencing, Driving Offences, Failure to Comply With Court Orders
Criminal Law Youth Detention Sentencing Driving Offences Failure to Comply With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown

Applicant

Defendant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether youth detention is appropriate under Article 4(2) of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law, 1994
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's history justifies a custodial sentence
  3. 3 Application of supervision requirements under Article 10

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's persistent failure to respond to non-custodial penalties, irresponsible conduct, and disregard for court orders satisfy the statutory criteria for youth detention under Article 4(2), making a custodial sentence unavoidable and necessary.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 12 months' youth detention
  • 24 months' disqualification from driving