Curtis v AG [1989] JRC 139 (14 August 1989)
The Attorney General's discretion not to prosecute is lawful unless exercised in bad faith or unlawfully, which was not established in this case.
- Citation
- [1989] JRC 139
- Parties
- Applicant: Curtis; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Prosecution, Public Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Curtis
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Attorney General's decision not to prosecute was lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The Attorney General's discretion not to prosecute is lawful unless exercised in bad faith or unlawfully, which was not established in this case.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment