AG v Warren and Others [2009] JRC 060H (03 April 2009)
The evidence of prison visits is relevant and not unfair to adduce; its authenticity is not challenged and it cannot be controverted. The probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect, so the evidence is admitted.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 060H
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: Curtis Warren; Defendant: John Alan Welsh; Defendant: James O'Brien; Defendant: Jason Woodward; Defendant: Paul Hunt; Defendant: Oliver Lucas; Amicus: R. Tremoceiro
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Prejudicial Effect Vs Probative Value, Bad Character Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Curtis Warren
Defendant
John Alan Welsh
Defendant
James O'Brien
Defendant
Jason Woodward
Defendant
Paul Hunt
Defendant
Oliver Lucas
Defendant
R. Tremoceiro
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prison visit records showing association between Warren and Liazid/Vatandas are admissible as evidence
- 2 Whether the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of prison visits is relevant and not unfair to adduce; its authenticity is not challenged and it cannot be controverted. The probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect, so the evidence is admitted.
Court Disposition
evidence admitted
Orders
- Prison visit records between 1 March 2007 and 14 June 2007 to Warren are admitted as evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment