AG v Warren and Others [2009] JRC 041B (05 March 2009)
No appeal lies as the application does not relate to questions of law or admissibility of evidence; application is out of time and without merit; no breach of Jersey code of conduct or grounds for recusal; leave to appeal refused.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 041B
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Attorney General; Defendant: Curtis Warren; Defendant: John Alan Welsh; Defendant: James O'Brien; Defendant: Jason Woodward; Defendant: Paul Hunt; Defendant: Oliver Lucas
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal Preparatory Hearing Rulings
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Admissibility of Evidence, Judicial Recusal, Trial Management, Rules of Conduct for Advocates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Attorney General
Prosecutor
Curtis Warren
Defendant
John Alan Welsh
Defendant
James O'Brien
Defendant
Jason Woodward
Defendant
Paul Hunt
Defendant
Oliver Lucas
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal Preparatory Hearing Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal relates to questions of law or admissibility of evidence under Article 86(3)
- 2 Whether the application is within the prescribed time limit under Rule 9(1)
- 3 Whether the conduct of prosecuting advocate breached rules of conduct
Ratio Decidendi
No appeal lies as the application does not relate to questions of law or admissibility of evidence; application is out of time and without merit; no breach of Jersey code of conduct or grounds for recusal; leave to appeal refused.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused.
- Reporting restrictions to continue until further direction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment