Warren and Others v AG [2009] JCA 175 (04 September 2009)
The Criminal Offences (Jersey) Law 2009 does not retrospectively alter the mode of trial for proceedings in which the defendants have already validly elected trial by jury under the Loi (1864) Reglant la Procedure Criminelle before the new law came into force; the right to elect mode of trial is a statutory right and cannot be undone by subsequent procedural legislation unless expressly stated.
- Citation
- [2009] JCA 175
- Parties
- Applicant: Curtis Warren; Applicant: John Alan Welsh; Applicant: James O'Brien; Applicant: Jason Woodward; Applicant: Paul Hunt; Applicant: Oliver Lucas; Respondent: The Attorney General; Amicus: Advocate R. Tremoceiro
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Pre Trial Determination of Mode of Trial
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Mode of Trial, Retroactivity, Statutory Offences, Customary Law Offences, Right to Elect Jury Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Curtis Warren
Applicant
John Alan Welsh
Applicant
James O'Brien
Applicant
Jason Woodward
Applicant
Paul Hunt
Applicant
Oliver Lucas
Applicant
The Attorney General
Respondent
Advocate R. Tremoceiro
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Pre Trial Determination of Mode of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants are entitled to trial by jury or by judge and jurats for conspiracy to commit a statutory offence under Jersey law
- 2 Whether the Criminal Offences (Jersey) Law 2009 applies retroactively to alter the mode of trial after election under the Loi (1864) Reglant la Procedure Criminelle
Ratio Decidendi
The Criminal Offences (Jersey) Law 2009 does not retrospectively alter the mode of trial for proceedings in which the defendants have already validly elected trial by jury under the Loi (1864) Reglant la Procedure Criminelle before the new law came into force; the right to elect mode of trial is a statutory right and cannot be undone by subsequent procedural legislation unless expressly stated.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Trial to be conducted before a judge sitting with a jury
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment