In the matter of D (Care order) [2014] JRC 134 (19 June 2014)
Proceedings under the Children (Jersey) Law 2003 may be struck out only under the Court's inherent jurisdiction, not under Royal Court Rules 2004. The threshold for striking out is extremely high in child welfare cases, and D's application is not so obviously doomed to failure as to warrant strike out without a hearing.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 134
- Parties
- Applicant: D; First Respondent: Minister; Second Respondent: Father
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Discharge Care Order / Application to Strike Out
- Outcome
- application to strike out refused
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Discharge of Care Orders, Inherent Jurisdiction, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D
Applicant
Minister
First Respondent
Father
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Discharge Care Order / Application to Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Royal Court Rules 2004 apply to proceedings under the Children (Jersey) Law 2003?
- 2 Does the Court have inherent jurisdiction to strike out applications in child welfare proceedings?
- 3 Should D's application to discharge the care order be struck out as frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process?
Ratio Decidendi
Proceedings under the Children (Jersey) Law 2003 may be struck out only under the Court's inherent jurisdiction, not under Royal Court Rules 2004. The threshold for striking out is extremely high in child welfare cases, and D's application is not so obviously doomed to failure as to warrant strike out without a hearing.
Court Disposition
application to strike out refused
Orders
- Guardian appointed for D's discharge application
- Ms Leonora Green appointed as guardian
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment